Design of the Regulatory Information Management System (RIMS) with enterprise-grade Document Management System (DMS) for the Electricity Regulatory Commission (ERC), Nepal
A source-backed decision brief. The official notice and its addenda remain authoritative.
Open the official listing and related documents
Official notice, TOR and amendments
Archived notice — the recorded submission deadline (2026-09-17) has passed. This record is retained for reference and excluded from active tenders.
Important participation conditions
International participation is permitted subject to the nationality restrictions in ITO Clause 5 and other MCC eligibility requirements; international does not mean every firm is eligible.
Read the official conditions ↗Project objective and employer selection criteria
1. Project objective
Objective
of Consultancy and B2/B3
(RFO PDF page 66-68)
The RFO indicates that ERC has an existing online
DMS launched in 2025 and requires assessment of
the existing system and integration with the
proposed RIMS-DMS.
Kindly clarify whether the
Consultant may recommend enhancement,
modernization, reuse or integration of the existing
DMS, instead of complete replacement, where the
assessment establishes that the existing platform
Please refer to Section V.
ToR Background
and Paragraphs B2 and B3.
The Consultant
shall assess the existing systems and
develop recommendations based on the
requirements of the assignment.
No change
to the RFO.
3
SN Reference to the Request
for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge
Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal)
can meet the required functional, technical,
security and scalability requirements.
5.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B2(b)
(RFO PDF page 66)
The TOR requires assessment and integration of
peripheral applications, the existing DMS and the
ERC website.
Please provide the currently known
list of such applications/ systems and clarify
whether existing API/interface specifications,
integration documentation and relevant technical
documentation will be made available to the
Consultant
Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs
B2(b), B2(g) and F.1(b).
Relevant information
and documentation, if available with ERC or
MCA-Nepal, will be provided to the selected
Consultant upon request.
The Consultant
shall assess the existing systems and obtain
all information required to carry out the
assignment successfully.
No change to the RFO.
6.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B2(a),
B3(a) – (c) and B4
(RFO PDF page 66-67,69-71)
Please provide the approximate number of existing
documents/records, annual document growth,
current storage volume, document types/file
formats and expected retention period.
These
parameters are required for DMS architecture,
storage sizing, and cost estimation.
Please refer to Section V, ToR Sections B2,
B3 and B4.
The Consultant shall carry out the
assessment of ERC’s existing systems and
develop the required architecture,
specifications, sizing and cost estimates
based on the findings of the assessment.
No change to the RFO.
7.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B3(a) – (c)
(RFO PDF page 67)
Please clarify whether ERC has any existing
enterprise architecture, technology, infrastructure,
cybersecurity, hosting, cloud, interoperability or
ICT standards/ guidelines that must be adhered to
while preparing the RIMS-DMS architecture and
technical specifications.
Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs A
and B3(a)-(c).
The Consultant shall develop
recommendations in alignment with ERC’s
objectives, the Government of Nepal’s IT
policies, Nepal’s regulatory framework, and
relevant international standards and best
practices.
No change to the RFO.
4
SN Reference to the Request
for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge
Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal)
8.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B3 (b)
(RFO PDF page 67)
Please provide the expected number of RIMS-DMS
users and user categories/roles, including ERC
staff, Commission Members, external
applicants/licensees, public users and other
stakeholders, for the purpose of defining licensing,
sizing and access-control requirements.
Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs
B2(b) and B3(b).
During implementation, the
Consultant shall gather detailed requirements
from relevant ERC stakeholders and
determine the functional and technical
requirements, including user categories,
roles, access controls, and related sizing
requirements.
No change to the RFO.
9.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B3 (c)
(RFO PDF page 67)
Please provide details of ERC's existing
datacenter/ hosting and cloud infrastructure, if any,
and clarify any mandatory data residency, data
sovereignty, cloud adoption or disaster recovery
requirements that the Consultant must consider
while evaluating and recommending the
deployment model.
Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs,
B3(c) and 3.2.
The Consultant shall assess
ERC’s current IT environment and
recommend the most suitable deployment
model, including hosting, disaster recovery,
and related requirements, in compliance with
applicable local regulatory requirements.
No change to the RFO
10.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B4(d), B4(e)
and B5 / Section III – Conflict
of Interest
(RFO PDF page 20, 70-72)
Section V – TOR, B4(d), B4(e) and B5 / Section III
– Conflict of Interest
The Consultant will be responsible for preparing
the Purchaser's Requirements, technical
specifications, qualification and evaluation criteria
and budget estimate for the subsequent
procurement of the RIMS-DMS Supplier and will
also support the evaluation and contract
negotiation process.
Kindly clarify whether the
Consultant, its Associates, JV members or
nominated Sub-Consultants will be eligible to
participate in the subsequent RIMS-DMS
implementation procurement, or whether such
There may be a conflict of interest as
Instruction to Offerors (ITO) sub-clause
5.9, states “A Consultant that has been
engaged by the Accountable Entity to
provide goods, works or services other
than consulting services for a project, and
any of its affiliates, shall be disqualified
from providing consulting services related
to those goods, works or services.
Conversely, a Consultant hired to provide
consulting services for the preparation or
implementation of a project, and any of its
affiliates, shall be disqualified from
5
SN Reference to the Request
for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge
Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal)
participation would be considered a conflict of
interest under the applicable MCC procurement
provisions.
subsequently providing goods, works or
services other than consulting services
resulting from or directly related to such
consulting services for such preparation
or implementation.
For example, a
Consultant hired to prepare terms of
reference for an assignment should not
be hired for the assignment in question.
For the purpose of this paragraph,
services other than consulting services
are defined as those leading to a
measurable physical output, for example
surveys, exploratory drilling, aerial
photography, and satellite imagery.”
11.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B6
(RFO PDF page 72)
Please clarify the indicative number/frequency and
expected duration of such inspections and whether
any travel outside Kathmandu is anticipated, so
that the Consultant can appropriately estimate the
required level of effort and travel costs.
Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs
B6 and D.
The inspections are to be
conducted as required during the
implementation phase.
Offerors shall
estimate the level of effort and associated
costs necessary to successfully complete the
assignment in accordance with the ToR.
12.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B6 /
Acceptance Testing
(RFO PDF page 72)
Please clarify the scope and contractual effect of
such certification and confirm that the Consultant's
certification is limited to technical verification
against the agreed acceptance criteria.
Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraph B6.
The Consultant shall participate in the Quality
and Acceptance Testing process and issue
the final certification of Acceptance Testing in
consultation with the ERC team constituted
for this purpose.
The requirements remain as
stated in the RFO.
6
SN Reference to the Request
for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge
Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal)
13.
Section V.
Terms of
Reference (ToR), B6 /
Acceptance Testing
(RFO PDF page 72)
Please provide the complete breakup of the
timeline for consulting work as well as procurement
of hardware and RIMS/DMS software components
all together in a gantt chart format for better
understanding on the consultants SOW.
Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs D
and Form TECH-10.
The duration and
sequencing of the assignment are specified
in the RFO.
Offerors shall develop and submit
their proposed work plan and schedule in
accordance with the ToR and Form TECH-
10.
14.
Section I.
Instructions to
Offerors (Consulting
Services), ITO 5, Eligible
Consultants
We would appreciate your clarification on whether
this tender is open to international bidders.
Kindly confirm the eligibility criteria for international
participation.
Yes, this is open to international bidders
subject to the nationality restrictions specified
in ITO 5.3.
You are requested to refer to ITO 5.3 of RFO
for further information.
15.
Section III – Qualification and
Evaluation Criteria, A.4.
Technical Evaluation,
Criterion 1.1
(RFO PDF page 12)
We would appreciate clarification regarding the
specific RIMS/DMS experience requirements,
particularly the requirement for 10 years of
experience in RIMS/DMS design and
development and System Requirements Study
for two RIMS/DMS projects .
Considering that RIMS/DMS is an enterprise
information system involving requirements
analysis, workflow assessment, system
architecture and design, database management,
document management, integration, and
implementation, we believe that these
competencies can also be demonstrated through
relevant and comparable enterprise-level IT
assignments .
Therefore, we kindly request whether the
experience criteria may provide flexibility to
consider similar IT projects and assignments
It is the responsibility of Offerors to provide
information/evidence on how the submitted
experience fulfils the requirements in the
evaluation criteria.
The assessment of the submitted experience
is under the responsibility of the evaluation
panel appointed to evaluate the submitted
Offer.
However, please note that the requirement
for criteria 1.1 has been amended.
Please
refer to Addendum#1.
7
SN Reference to the Request
for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge
Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal)
involving enterprise applications, MIS, DMS,
web-based systems, database-driven
applications, system requirements studies, and
related system design and implementation .
Such an approach would allow the evaluation to
focus on the consultant's demonstrated technical
capability and relevant experience in delivering
comparable systems , rather than limiting
objective scoring of the qualification requirements
for Key Professional Personnel, including the Team
Leader.
In this we request for confirmation that
Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and
Communication, Electronics and Instrumentation,
Electronics and Communication Engineering,
Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering,
Electronics Engineering, Electronics and
Telecommunication Engineering, or equivalent ICT
/ electronics engineering discipline will be
considered eligible for full scoring under the
educational qualification requirement for the Team
Leader role.
This clarification is requested since the proposed
assignment is an ICT-enabled institutional digital
transformation engagement covering RIMS-DMS
design, system architecture, IT infrastructure,
system integration, workflow/database design,
hosting options, procurement of a System
Integrator and implementation oversight.
These
areas are closely aligned with electronics,
Please refer to the Technical Evaluation
Framework under Section III and note that
meeting the minimum educational
Source / meaning
Services), ITO 5, Eligibleحساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
in ITO 5.3.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
متن شاهد این عدد در رکورد فعلی موجود نیست؛ موضوع دقیق از سند رسمی باید احراز شود.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
متن شاهد این عدد در رکورد فعلی موجود نیست؛ موضوع دقیق از سند رسمی باید احراز شود.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
متن شاهد این عدد در رکورد فعلی موجود نیست؛ موضوع دقیق از سند رسمی باید احراز شود.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
متن شاهد این عدد در رکورد فعلی موجود نیست؛ موضوع دقیق از سند رسمی باید احراز شود.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
particularly the requirement for 10 years ofحساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
Source / meaning
متن شاهد این عدد در رکورد فعلی موجود نیست؛ موضوع دقیق از سند رسمی باید احراز شود.حساب چالش هزاره نپال — official notice / tender document
View the official objective and scope excerpt
Objective of Consultancy and B2/B3 (RFO PDF page 66-68) The RFO indicates that ERC has an existing online DMS launched in 2025 and requires assessment of the existing system and integration with the proposed RIMS-DMS. Kindly clarify whether the Consultant may recommend enhancement, modernization, reuse or integration of the existing DMS, instead of complete replacement, where the assessment establishes that the existing platform Please refer to Section V. ToR Background and Paragraphs B2 and B3. The Consultant shall assess the existing systems and develop recommendations based on the requirements of the assignment. No change to the RFO. 3 SN Reference to the Request for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal) can meet the required functional, technical, security and scalability requirements. 5. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B2(b) (RFO PDF page 66) The TOR requires assessment and integration of peripheral applications, the existing DMS and the ERC website. Please provide the currently known list of such applications/ systems and clarify whether existing API/interface specifications, integration documentation and relevant technical documentation will be made available to the Consultant Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs B2(b), B2(g) and F.1(b). Relevant information and documentation, if available with ERC or MCA-Nepal, will be provided to the selected Consultant upon request. The Consultant shall assess the existing systems and obtain all information required to carry out the assignment successfully. No change to the RFO. 6. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B2(a), B3(a) – (c) and B4 (RFO PDF page 66-67,69-71) Please provide the approximate number of existing documents/records, annual document growth, current storage volume, document types/file formats and expected retention period. These parameters are required for DMS architecture, storage sizing, and cost estimation. Please refer to Section V, ToR Sections B2, B3 and B4. The Consultant shall carry out the assessment of ERC’s existing systems and develop the required architecture, specifications, sizing and cost estimates based on the findings of the assessment. No change to the RFO. 7. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B3(a) – (c) (RFO PDF page 67) Please clarify whether ERC has any existing enterprise architecture, technology, infrastructure, cybersecurity, hosting, cloud, interoperability or ICT standards/ guidelines that must be adhered to while preparing the RIMS-DMS architecture and technical specifications. Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs A and B3(a)-(c). The Consultant shall develop recommendations in alignment with ERC’s objectives, the Government of Nepal’s IT policies, Nepal’s regulatory framework, and relevant international standards and best practices. No change to the RFO. 4 SN Reference to the Request for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal) 8. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B3 (b) (RFO PDF page 67) Please provide the expected number of RIMS-DMS users and user categories/roles, including ERC staff, Commission Members, external applicants/licensees, public users and other stakeholders, for the purpose of defining licensing, sizing and access-control requirements. Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs B2(b) and B3(b). During implementation, the Consultant shall gather detailed requirements from relevant ERC stakeholders and determine the functional and technical requirements, including user categories, roles, access controls, and related sizing requirements. No change to the RFO. 9. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B3 (c) (RFO PDF page 67) Please provide details of ERC's existing datacenter/ hosting and cloud infrastructure, if any, and clarify any mandatory data residency, data sovereignty, cloud adoption or disaster recovery requirements that the Consultant must consider while evaluating and recommending the deployment model. Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs, B3(c) and 3.2. The Consultant shall assess ERC’s current IT environment and recommend the most suitable deployment model, including hosting, disaster recovery, and related requirements, in compliance with applicable local regulatory requirements. No change to the RFO 10. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B4(d), B4(e) and B5 / Section III – Conflict of Interest (RFO PDF page 20, 70-72) Section V – TOR, B4(d), B4(e) and B5 / Section III – Conflict of Interest The Consultant will be responsible for preparing the Purchaser's Requirements, technical specifications, qualification and evaluation criteria and budget estimate for the subsequent procurement of the RIMS-DMS Supplier and will also support the evaluation and contract negotiation process. Kindly clarify whether the Consultant, its Associates, JV members or nominated Sub-Consultants will be eligible to participate in the subsequent RIMS-DMS implementation procurement, or whether such There may be a conflict of interest as Instruction to Offerors (ITO) sub-clause 5.9, states “A Consultant that has been engaged by the Accountable Entity to provide goods, works or services other than consulting services for a project, and any of its affiliates, shall be disqualified from providing consulting services related to those goods, works or services. Conversely, a Consultant hired to provide consulting services for the preparation or implementation of a project, and any of its affiliates, shall be disqualified from 5 SN Reference to the Request for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal) participation would be considered a conflict of interest under the applicable MCC procurement provisions. subsequently providing goods, works or services other than consulting services resulting from or directly related to such consulting services for such preparation or implementation. For example, a Consultant hired to prepare terms of reference for an assignment should not be hired for the assignment in question. For the purpose of this paragraph, services other than consulting services are defined as those leading to a measurable physical output, for example surveys, exploratory drilling, aerial photography, and satellite imagery.” 11. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B6 (RFO PDF page 72) Please clarify the indicative number/frequency and expected duration of such inspections and whether any travel outside Kathmandu is anticipated, so that the Consultant can appropriately estimate the required level of effort and travel costs. Please refer to Section V, ToR, Paragraphs B6 and D. The inspections are to be conducted as required during the implementation phase. Offerors shall estimate the level of effort and associated costs necessary to successfully complete the assignment in accordance with the ToR. 12. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B6 / Acceptance Testing (RFO PDF page 72) Please clarify the scope and contractual effect of such certification and confirm that the Consultant's certification is limited to technical verification against the agreed acceptance criteria. Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraph B6. The Consultant shall participate in the Quality and Acceptance Testing process and issue the final certification of Acceptance Testing in consultation with the ERC team constituted for this purpose. The requirements remain as stated in the RFO. 6 SN Reference to the Request for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal) 13. Section V. Terms of Reference (ToR), B6 / Acceptance Testing (RFO PDF page 72) Please provide the complete breakup of the timeline for consulting work as well as procurement of hardware and RIMS/DMS software components all together in a gantt chart format for better understanding on the consultants SOW. Please refer to Section V, ToR Paragraphs D and Form TECH-10. The duration and sequencing of the assignment are specified in the RFO. Offerors shall develop and submit their proposed work plan and schedule in accordance with the ToR and Form TECH- 10. 14. Section I. Instructions to Offerors (Consulting Services), ITO 5, Eligible Consultants We would appreciate your clarification on whether this tender is open to international bidders. Kindly confirm the eligibility criteria for international participation. Yes, this is open to international bidders subject to the nationality restrictions specified in ITO 5.3. You are requested to refer to ITO 5.3 of RFO for further information. 15. Section III – Qualification and Evaluation Criteria, A.4. Technical Evaluation, Criterion 1.1 (RFO PDF page 12) We would appreciate clarification regarding the specific RIMS/DMS experience requirements, particularly the requirement for 10 years of experience in RIMS/DMS design and development and System Requirements Study for two RIMS/DMS projects . Considering that RIMS/DMS is an enterprise information system involving requirements analysis, workflow assessment, system architecture and design, database management, document management, integration, and implementation, we believe that these competencies can also be demonstrated through relevant and comparable enterprise-level IT assignments . Therefore, we kindly request whether the experience criteria may provide flexibility to consider similar IT projects and assignments It is the responsibility of Offerors to provide information/evidence on how the submitted experience fulfils the requirements in the evaluation criteria. The assessment of the submitted experience is under the responsibility of the evaluation panel appointed to evaluate the submitted Offer. However, please note that the requirement for criteria 1.1 has been amended. Please refer to Addendum#1. 7 SN Reference to the Request for Offers Questions from Offers Response of Millennium Challenge Account Nepal (MCA-Nepal) involving enterprise applications, MIS, DMS, web-based systems, database-driven applications, system requirements studies, and related system design and implementation . Such an approach would allow the evaluation to focus on the consultant's demonstrated technical capability and relevant experience in delivering comparable systems , rather than limiting objective scoring of the qualification requirements for Key Professional Personnel, including the Team Leader. In this we request for confirmation that Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and Communication, Electronics and Instrumentation, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Electronics Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, or equivalent ICT / electronics engineering discipline will be considered eligible for full scoring under the educational qualification requirement for the Team Leader role. This clarification is requested since the proposed assignment is an ICT-enabled institutional digital transformation engagement covering RIMS-DMS design, system architecture, IT infrastructure, system integration, workflow/database design, hosting options, procurement of a System Integrator and implementation oversight. These areas are closely aligned with electronics, Please refer to the Technical Evaluation Framework under Section III and note that meeting the minimum educational
Extraction covers only the accessible source. Linked TORs and later addenda are not verified unless their text has been retrieved; a missing field never means no requirement.
Shortlisting / qualification criteria
FANAB could not access enough official text to extract this category reliably. Open the official notice and tender documents before making a qualification decision.
Unstated means “not found in the official text currently available to FANAB”, not “not required”. Always verify the complete notice, TOR and addenda.
